Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soulescape.com
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. -- ( drini's page ☎ ) 23:59, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blatent advertising. Wondered if this could be speedied, but couldn't find a criteria that matched (please correct me if there is). Delete. Petros471 19:19, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- There is also Soulescape --Petros471 20:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. spam. And you're right, spam still has to be AfD'd for now.--Esprit15d 19:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom and concur w/ esprit15d. Dbchip 19:34, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom, concur. --Lockley 20:24, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as spam. --NaconKantari 21:36, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Just spam. (aeropagitica) 22:58, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete "Pure vandalism" is listed as criteria for speedy deletions. Wikipedia's definition of vandalism includes spam. This article is nothing but spam, therefore it is pure vandalism. Makes no sense to me why we should sit around for days waiting for it to be taken off. Same result either way. Kafziel 23:15, 18 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Well that's an intersting point, since spam is listed on the vandalism page. I think most wikipedians consider those two different things, but there is an argument for it being a speedy criteria. The only thing is, there is a policy in place that spam has to be afd'd. I guess this policy has to be cleared up.--Esprit15d 14:02, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Agree that policy needs to be cleared up. I guess the problem of automatically speedy deleting any spam article is when the subject of the article is fine, but the way it is written isn't (AfD give a change for the article to be re-written). On the other hand, we really don't want articles like this sitting around for a week, with the load it puts on AFD. Petros471 14:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete vandalism, spam. and poorly written, not to mention that the article says soulescpase currently has 1800 members. uh, hello. thats like 1/10000000000 of the people on earth. delete, delete, delete.Leo Collin 02:28, 20 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.