Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soul Calibur (sword)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was keep. Johnleemk | Talk 08:12, 13 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Blatent redundancy in the clearest sense of the word. Strong Delete per same reason as the Soul edge article above. MegamanZero|Talk 08:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect. Place the relevant information into the parent article and leave a redirect to discourage recreation. Movementarian 10:28, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge, as Movementarian suggests. -- Mikeblas 11:32, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. I wouldn't vote to keep, say, an article on Setsuka's iaito. But the Soul Edge and Soul Calibur are very much central to the plot of this very popular and notable series of games. They're what everybody is fighting over, and thus the driving force behind the story. Compare Master Sword and Death Star, or just about anything on List of fictional swords or List of fictional weapons. "Soul Calibur" gets 1,710,000 Google hits. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:39, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- But there's no reason to split them up into two articles. See Soul Calibur mystical weapons which is the oringinal article that these two were taken from. Also, the Soul Calibur mystical weapons article was here first. -MegamanZero|Talk 15:58, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per above. -- JJay 00:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep as above. - SAMAS 11 January 2006
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.