Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sorority Wars
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. — Cirt (talk) 01:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Sorority Wars[edit]
- Sorority Wars (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested PROD. Article fails WP:MOVIE or any other notability guideline. Sources are only to a minor review by variety and various industry sites talking about what popular teen stars are up to this week. Most sources are IMDb which just provide evidence that the tv-movie exists, not that it's notable. Dismas|(talk) 20:01, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. —I, Jethrobot drop me a line 20:42, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per significant coverage from reliable sources. Like you mentioned, there is a Variety review. There is also coverage from The News & Observer, New York Daily News, Buffalo News, New York Post, and The Journal Gazette. There's also a shorter article at Reuters. It seems to me enough for a Wikipedia article, which does not have to be more than 1,000 words provided enough coverage exists. Erik (talk | contribs) 17:42, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep because reliable sources have talked about it and given it coverage. I added a link rot tag. KING OF WIKIPEDIA - GRIM LITTLEZ (talk) 02:46, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - siginficant coverage in mutiple reliable sources.--BelovedFreak 10:13, 7 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.