Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Stuart (1606)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. ✗plicit 13:04, 19 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Stuart (1606)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

not exactly lack of notability, more a n almost complete lack of an real content for an article; I'm suggestting a merge to one or both of the parents. TheLongTone (talk) 12:16, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Royalty and nobility and England. Shellwood (talk) 13:31, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. There are several bibliographic references Mario93 (talk) 20:39, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. The article has referenced details to the customs of royal childbirth of the day, and references to the surviving monument and its makers, with pictures.Unoquha (talk) 22:24, 12 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. I don't see any good reason to merge this with any other article. Srsval (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Historically notable.--Ipigott (talk) 11:49, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Kj cheetham (talk) 09:12, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Notable on the basis of monuments, illustrations, and references in the literature. Topshelver (talk) 23:36, 14 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as this British princess is notable. cookie monster 755 05:31, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep for reasons stated above EmilySarah99 (talk) 08:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.