Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sophia Baars

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Black Kite 07:29, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sophia Baars[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:ENT and WP:BIO. simply appearing in various minor roles does not make one notable. little third party coverage [1], and most of this coverage is passing mentions rather than in depth. LibStar (talk) 03:48, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. —Bluemask (talk) 05:27, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. B.Rossow ^talk_contr 17:54, 21 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Fences&Windows 21:33, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Wildhartlivie (talk) 22:21, 22 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:19, 28 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The subject's portrayal as Lavinia was a main antagonist role in Princess Sarah. Starczamora (talk) 13:20, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Fails WP:ENTERTAINER requirement for multiple notable roles. Lara 19:02, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Fails WP:ENT - Alison ^❤ 01:45, 5 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.