Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sony Ericsson Z550
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep. Maser (Talk!) 07:32, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Sony Ericsson Z550[edit]
- Sony Ericsson Z550 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Non-notable product. Wikipedia is not a Sony-Ericsson catalog. Too few substantial references exist to support a meaningful Wikipedia article; practically all references are reviews and press-release reports. Listing at AfD after contested {{prod}} with a WP:WAX argument. Mikeblas 23:56, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - should we now go and delete all articles on mobile phones? Is this phone less notable than any other Sony Ericsson phone or indeed any other phone? If this article on a modern mobile phone were to be deleted, this could set a precedent. Agree that better referencing should be carried out, however. Would only support deletion if all other 'non-notable' phone articles were deleted. --EJF 19:10, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - article rewrite needed and better referencing, but should be kept. --ZeWrestler Talk 05:53, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Encyclopedic, notable, etc. 500K google hits. Major product with lots of sales. Getting tired of dealing with this issue Ad nauseam. Can we put a lid on it? Wikidemo (talk) 11:57, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I think there should be a total review of this cell-phone issue. I hope I don't offend anyone by saying so, but I have started to dislike what seems to be a salami-tactic used to delete all the cell-phones. Also, it is my conviction Wikipedia should - in general- have an article of all cell-phones with notable sources, so people comming and looking for information, will find it here. Greswik (talk) 14:53, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.