Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sons of night

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 02:58, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sons of night[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet the notability guidelines for musicians. No significant coverage in independent reliable sources, nor charting in a major mainstream chart- I couldn't see them listed in the you tube chart either. Likely auto biography too. The-Pope (talk) 01:18, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. 16:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. 16:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC) • Gene93k (talk) 16:21, 15 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 00:51, 22 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Notability not established, fails WP:BAND. References from social media and other unreliable sources. WWGB (talk) 03:07, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. I'm unable to find significant coverage or other evidence that this group meets WP:GNG or WP:BAND at this time. Gongshow ^Talk 16:16, 25 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete fails WP:BAND. LibStar (talk) 12:41, 27 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.