Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sonic Jam 6

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 21:19, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sonic Jam 6[edit]

Another Pirate/ROM hack with nothing but graphic changes. These kinds of games do not deserve their own article, because any one over the age of 4 could do this. Newspaper98 21:00, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom M1ss1ontom a rs2k4 ^{(T | C | @)} 22:46, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete pirated game = more notable than a ROM hack, but not by much. 59 unique Google hits. Delete. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:20, 29 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Gogo Dodo 01:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete' ditto all above. -Colonial One 01:37, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WHY DELETE IT???— Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.122.135 (talk • contribs) 01:48, 30 July 2006

Note: This debate has been added to the list of CVG deletions. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 03:07, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. RandyWang (^raves/_{review me!}) 03:13, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete maybe mention in another article, btu not suggesting sufficient notability for it to have its own page. Plus, there are verifiability problems. Ace of Sevens 12:03, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. --Kuroki Mio 2006 19:17, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - As Non-notable. I would like to point out however this AfD doesnt list a reason for it to be deleted, not a valid one at least. Because many people can do it, is not a legit reason to delete articles. --zero faults ^{|sockpuppets|} 12:36, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. --Stellmach 17:02, 1 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per the reasons given for deleting all rom-hacks: WP:NN, WP:NOT. Th ε Halo ^Θ 11:44, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.