Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SonicAdvDX
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Kirill Lokshin 03:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Well, maybe I'm wading into it here... but this seems a bit out of Encyclopedic range. I'm sure the life of 'SonicAdvDX is important to its creator. But it stops there doesn't it? --Bookandcoffee 02:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, unencyclopedic. No use at all to Wikipedia. In addition, I fixed up your AfD so that it now appears on October 31's page. Please read the bottom of Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion (the bit with the yellow, light orange and dark orange colors) next time you submit an AfD. Don't worry about this mishap; I royally screwed it up myself the first time I submitted one. -- RattleMan 02:44, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - the article is extensive, but the site is not notable. --Jtalledo (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Put it on the Sonic the Hedgehog Information Treasury if need be, but I say Delete from Wikipedia; doesn't seem notable enough for here. --Shadow Hog 02:41, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, delete, delete!! It's bad enough cleaning up articles about non-notable Internet forums — now we have to deal with articles about non-notable forum members?! --keepsleeping say what 03:08, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong Delete - Does not meet WP:BIO. Also two images on this page Image:SPA Sonic.PNG and Image:Collage.PNG are marked as free for any purpose, but as sprite rips they are copyright Sega and SonicAdvDX does not have the right to release them for any purpose. --JiFish(Talk/Contrib) 12:29, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Supersonic Delete. Anyone whose sole claim to fame is being a forum member does NOT belong on Wikipedia. Really now. flowersofnight 15:27, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. Unencyclopedic and non-notable. Carioca 20:50, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.