Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Whispering^(talk/c) 18:44, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Songun[edit]

~~This really is simply a page of opinions, totally POV its completely made up of commentary and accusations about korea. basically its what someone thinks Frogsprog 13:47, 22 September 2006 (UTC)~~[reply]

Petition accepted. Unsourced POV - FrancisTyers · 13:51, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ Keep. Using Google it strikes me that the topic itself is notable. AfD is a sledgehammer to crack a nut here. I've added tags for citations and expert help. There is a Korean article which I can't read that may have the notability this one needs. I'm simply concerned that going straight to AfD is not appropriate here. Fiddle Faddle 13:56, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Article now improved but very stubby. Just better than a sub-stub, so needs serious attention, but it is perfectly keepable. Fiddle Faddle 15:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I've removed the non-NPOV second sentence. This is obviously a notable subject which needs expanding, not deleting. Yomangani ^talk 14:07, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Findings undeniable. Some editor appears to have gone over the article with a fine-toothed comb! --ForbiddenWord 14:08, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

what does findings undeniable mean? are you pro or anti deletion? --The duck 14:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

delete. pointless article! POV. no content --The duck 14:13, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

not voting here, just wondering if, as the nominator I am allowed to vote? --Frogsprog 14:15, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This isn't a vote, it's an attempt to reach concensus, and as nominator it is taken that you think it should be deleted unless you state otherwise. Yomangani ^talk 14:22, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per Yomangani, notable concept, NPOV stub. --Huon 14:24, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep since POV has been removed. Noteworthy topic, now it just needs expansion. —dustmite 14:45, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
changing opinion: KEEP I would like to withdraw my proposal for deletion and request expansion on the article --Frogsprog 15:46, 22 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.