Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Songs for Communion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 08:00, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Songs for Communion[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:NALBUMS Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:22, 22 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:28, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No evidence of independent significant coverage. WWGB (talk) 01:36, 23 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Discussed in at least three independent sources - Christianity Today, Cross Rhythms (which is cited in the article!), and this book (wish I could give the page number instead of the search url, but Google Books is very annoying now in that it often doesn't display page numbers).--¿3family6 _contribs 15:46, 24 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per 3family6's good research.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:44, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The book page number is likely 170 (you'll see that in the URL, but it may not be precise), that and the Christianity Today article seem to meet GNG. --j⚛e decker ^talk 05:59, 1 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, slakr^\ talk / 01:01, 3 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep sufficient independent verifiable sources now provided.Dan arndt (talk) 13:44, 4 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.