Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son of Bazerk

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 08:36, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Son of Bazerk

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Group fails WP:GNG. Koala15 (talk) 05:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2013 July 15. Snotbot t • c » 06:12, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Coverage includes The Village Voice [1], Spin [2], Los Angeles Times [3], this Public Enemy biography [4], Entertainment Weekly [5], and Allmusic [6][7]. Subject meets WP:GNG and WP:MUSICBIO. Gong show 17:37, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New York-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:30, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 18:43, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mark Arsten (talk) 17:12, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, based on the couple of news items in the article and the additional ones found by Gongshow. They attracted notice in 1991 and their reunion has attracted notice too. Sionk (talk) 20:29, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Passes WP:MUSIC per Gongshow. SL93 (talk) 00:44, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.