Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Son Records

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗plicit 12:11, 14 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Son Records

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A notification concern was raised about this article. After quadruple checking pretty much every search term I could. I cannot find any sign of any coverage of this organization whatsoever beyond the currently listed BBC article, which seems to provide tangential coverage only. Unless I missed a source here in my search, I think that may mean this organization may fail WP:GNG. Allan Nonymous (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Music and United Kingdom. Allan Nonymous (talk) 11:47, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 12:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 18:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, fails NCORP. Found a mention in the BBC but nothing else Mach61 18:58, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.