Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Something Like Silas

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Sandstein 16:13, 7 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Something Like Silas

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Though I do remember this band, I don't believe it meets our notability guidelines. Natg 19 (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians and California. Natg 19 (talk) 05:24, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I'm also unsure if their "sequel" band, Future of Forestry is notable either, but that can be a different discussion. Natg 19 (talk) 05:54, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep This incarnation barely made a dent in the Christian music scene. Powell, Mark Allan (2002). Encyclopedia of Contemporary Christian Music. Peabody, Massachusetts: Hendrickson Publishers. ISBN 978-1565636798. was released as the band was starting and makes no mention of them. However, https://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/cdreviews/DivineInvitation.asp and https://www.crossrhythms.co.uk/products/Something_Like_Silas/Divine_Invitation/11647/ for this band and more for Future of Forestry (https://www.jesusfreakhideout.com/artists/FutureOfForestry.asp). Could support a redirect to FoF article and add a section about this band there. Many more sources for that band. Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:13, 16 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep With the sources above from WG and this Allmusic review, there's enough to hang an article on; CCM magazine may have a review, as well. Chubbles (talk) 02:29, 17 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 06:51, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:09, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.