Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Somebody's Mother's Chocolate Sauce
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. I see a rough consensus for a lack of significant coverage that would confer notability. Complex/Rational 18:12, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
Somebody's Mother's Chocolate Sauce[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Somebody's Mother's Chocolate Sauce (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
non-notable sauce; routine coverage only ~TPW 14:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Products-related deletion discussions. ~TPW 14:58, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete 100% fails WP:GNG. Although their URL, somebodysmothers.com, made me laugh. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 15:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment There's this in the Houston Chronicle [1] but it's paywalled so I didn't read it. I think it might be an ok-ish source. A few more like that one would really help notability. Oaktree b (talk) 15:35, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Food and drink, Companies, and Texas. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 18:04, 6 July 2023 (UTC)
- Comment News coverage of any significance that I have been able to locate are hyper-local. I did find three pages dedicated to her business and her in Social Media Marketing All-in-One For Dummies, which I put into the article. Graywalls (talk) 05:33, 8 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete any product mention in a "social media for dummies" book is going to be native advertising. It is a "boutique" product -- which means "too unimportant to be the subject of substantial coverage". Walt Yoder (talk) 00:04, 12 July 2023 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.