Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solomon Ian-Sangala

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 17:16, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Solomon Ian-Sangala[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject of the article fails WP:GNG. Another young entrepreneur with no evidence of notability. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 16:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 16:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Wikic¤l¤gy^{t@lk to M£} 16:11, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient coverage in secondary sources. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 19:29, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment In the interest of full disclosure, Brandonomari (talk · contribs) blanked the nominator's deletion rationale and some of the AfD templates, which I reverted. He or she replaced them with the following text, which should nevertheless be considered: Here is a notable source http://www.wandsworth.gov.uk/info/200242/open4business/2052/open4business_october_2015/7. --Nick⁠—⁠^Contact/_Contribs 19:51, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A notable source http://goearlsfield.blogspot.co.uk/ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Komalakbar (talk • contribs) 19:57, 28 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for now and draft and userfy if needed as I simply see no better improvement at this time. SwisterTwister talk 04:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Absolutely no evidence of notability in search engines. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:12, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.