Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Soliny Védrine
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Beeblebrox (talk) 20:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Soliny Védrine[edit]
- Soliny Védrine (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Unable to find sufficient non-trivial coverage of this clergyman in any reliable sources independent of the subject to establish notability. The article's external link provides the most coverage of him, two sentences, the rest list him with other clergyman who met with politicians or as the clergyman presiding over a funeral. Does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BASIC. J04n(talk page) 11:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 11:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. —J04n(talk page) 11:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Wikipedia:WikiProject Haiti was notified of this discussion. J04n(talk page) 11:40, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:23, 24 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, did my own searches, my results matched those described by the nominator, insufficient sourcing to demonstrate notability under the GNG. --j⚛e deckertalk 07:10, 27 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete. No claim of notability is made. Pburka (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak Keep He seems to be reasonably influential as a pastor among the Haitian community, at least according to the Boston Globe. However sources are not proving easy. JASpencer (talk) 20:12, 30 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.