Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Solidarity (Catholic theology)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Pope John Paul II. MBisanz ^talk 04:52, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Solidarity (Catholic theology)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Long-standing unreferenced mini-article. Reads like an essay on Solicitudo Rei Socialis, from which is quotes on a seemingly arbitrary basis. Unclear how this is in any way distinct as a topic from subsidiarity (Catholicism) (which itself read seems like a prematurely forked subpage of subsidiarity, but at least that one has sources). Delete, and move any meaningfully distinct content to those various other articles, as required. Smartiger (talk) 23:15, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:55, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment (I will do no more since I am not a Catholic) Sollicitudo Rei Socialis is a mere stub article. if the subject of this article derives from that encyclical, I wonder whehter the answer may be to merge this article into that one. The external link from that article is itself a long article setting out the backgound to the encyclical. It ought to be possible to make a decend article from that, without COPY-VIO. Peterkingiron (talk) 15:19, 8 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:01, 9 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I daresay that this topic has enough merits to make it a topic of interest in theology. Maybe it will be a better article - longer and more in-depth - if it received edits from people with expertise in this area. ACEOREVIVED (talk) 14:28, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - there is no evidence that this concept has been covered by secondary or tertiary sources. Bearian (talk) 22:33, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Cheers, Riley 00:12, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Use of term lacks coverage. Could be included as a section in Pope John Paul II but not as a standalone article. 1292simon (talk) 01:52, 17 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.