Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftwareGR
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Rlendog (talk) 18:42, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
SoftwareGR[edit]
- SoftwareGR (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
The subject of the article lacks significant coverage in reliable third party sources and fails the notability guidelines for organizations. Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 02:22, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Michigan-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. —Tom Morris (talk) 04:57, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete I'm only turning up trivial mentions in reliable sources, no significant coverage. Mark Arsten (talk) 16:58, 10 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - No coverage in reliable sources to establish notability. -- Joaquin008 (talk) 14:58, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- 'Delete: I found no significant coverage. SL93 (talk) 15:47, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.