Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SoftArtisans

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2010 December 22.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles 00:12, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

SoftArtisans[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

non notable company, created by an SPA account creating a series of articles about this company and its non notable products WuhWuzDat 06:28, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all (after adding an additional article from the same user). Fails WP:CORP; the only Ghits I can find are the company's website and free download sites. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:15, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I (barely...) declined a speedy on this but then bizarrely the original editor removed most of the claims to notability [1]. In its current state, I would have had no hesitation in deleting. Kim Dent-Brown ^(Talk) 07:17, 9 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

- Sorry, I'm a novice wiki-er, and I've been trying to see what flies and what doesn't. I wasn't trying to turn the wiki page into a promo at all, but I do feel that owning to the originality of what OfficeWriter does--allow users to generate excel spreadsheets and word docs over the web, without having local copies of Office--the company, or at the very least OfficeWriter, should be listed. Perhaps it's best to just create a page about OfficeWriter? I've been getting more approved sources together, including a few programming books that discuss the software. What do you think? I really do want to stay within wiki's guidelines. Cdulaney — Cdulaney (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Don't delete I added in notable sources, removed (I hope) all promotional language, and added information.

~~Cdulaney~~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cdulaney (talk • contribs) 17:05, 9 December 2010 (UTC) — Cdulaney (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 03:08, 10 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.