Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia rose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Pax:Vobiscum (talk) 09:28, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia rose

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Simply does not meet either WP:GNG or the specific guidelines for pornographic actresses. Was deprodded by article creator. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 15:00, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep:she had won 4 awards and pornographic actors does not have resources from the news websites because they dont want to destroy their reputation in public they have more information only in avn.com and other websites— Preceding unsigned comment added by Iamheentity (talk • contribs) 15:59, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The award wins (Inked, BBW etc.) are minor and don't satisfy the well-known and significant industry award standard of WP:PORNBIO. The AVN coverage consists of obvious press releases and self promotion. Even with porn, the lack of reliable secondary sources tends to indicate a lack of notability. • Gene93k (talk) 19:19, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:02, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions.CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:04, 22 November 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Delete. Fails WP:PORNBIO and WP:BASIC without significant coverage from independent reliable sources. • Gene93k (talk) 19:28, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Does not meet the requirements of WP:GNG. Pichpich (talk) 22:48, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Fails WP:GNG and I am not impressed by the awards. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 14:21, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as there is a lack of coverage in reliable sources so that WP:Basic is not passed, thank you Atlantic306 (talk) 22:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete does not meet our absurdly broad inclusion criteria for pornographic performers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:41, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.