Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sofia Milos

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 01:12, 25 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sofia Milos[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable per WP:NACTOR. Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 22:08, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Perhaps I am missing something, but isn't having a reoccurring role in a number of nationally syndicated television programs in line with WP:NACTOR? Article needs better sourcing, but looks a-ok to me. -Marcusmax(speak) 23:52, 18 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Keep "She is best known for her role as Yelina Salas on CSI: Miami (and on) The Sopranos". A regular role on a network program. WP:BEFORE not done; do it before you bring an article to AfD and please actually do more than "WP:" drops to form poor nominations like this. Nate • (chatter) 02:15, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is no speedy keep reason here that I can see. - SummerPhD (talk) 02:39, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I was pretty surprised to see this at AfD, until I did some searching for sources. I would personally count the role on CSI:(city name here) toward a presumption of notability under WP:ENT, but I'm not sure how significant any of the others are. More to the point, I can't seem to find sufficient coverage. Google news brings up nothing useful and a general web search is cluttered with "look at the photos!" kind of coverage of no meaningful substance. Sources? - SummerPhD (talk) 02:39, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm thinking you would be hard pressed to find reliable sources for some of these actors, sure they exist, but they are buried behind layers of gossip sites and "he said, she said" blogs. However, her notability can be demonstrated through her direct work, she as mention, plays a significant role in the CSI series. Plus a number of other roles in other syndicated series, seems notable to me. Marcusmax(speak) 04:31, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

At the moment, we have one source: her personal website. We do not have "significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources which are reliable, intellectually independent of each other, and independent of the subject", only a presumption of notability. "The barometer of notability is whether people independent of the subject itself have actually considered the subject notable enough that they have written and published non-trivial works that focus upon it." - SummerPhD (talk)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:35, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:36, 19 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The article could use an overhaul, but the subject is notable. This type of source may not win any awards, but when it's from a reliable source it helps establish notability. Andrew³²⁷ 01:37, 20 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as per Marcusmax and Andrewman327. Agree article needs revamp.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 11:31, 22 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.