Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sociometrics Corporation

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:16, 2 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sociometrics Corporation[edit]

Sociometrics Corporation (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable corporation as far as I can tell. Article is very close to WP:A7 status and nearly pure spam. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC) Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Headbomb {t · c · p · b} 08:57, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 16:06, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete On the face of it, I expected this company might be notable but after a search for references and an examination of references contained within the article, I am unable to find references that in my opinion, satisfy the criteria for establishing notability. The book references have all been produced by people connected with the company and this NIMHD reference does not have an "author" so fails as a potential reference. I'm happy to revisit this if someone can find references. But as of now, topic fails GNG and WP:NCORP. HighKing++ 16:26, 30 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.