Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social microcosm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Redirects may be created at editorial discretion. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:41, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Social microcosm[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Its only sources are dictionaries. Marcocapelle (talk) 10:38, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:40, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:12, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject only mentioned in passing in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 01:18, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Results of "Books" show this expression is mainly used in psychotherapy to describe therapy groups, but not in the way this article uses it. Kitfoxxe (talk) 01:20, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Gemeinschaft and Gesellschaft. Bearian (talk) 00:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.