Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Social Venture Network

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Feel free to speedy renominate if you desire. Missvain (talk) 23:58, 3 June 2021 (UTC)

Social Venture Network

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

• How to contribute
• Introduction to deletion process
• Guide to deletion (glossary)
• Help, my article got nominated for deletion!

Social Venture Network (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Entirely promotional and non-notable , with lack of good sources for notability that meet NCORP.

I am not even sure how much of this is still active, or ever was-- I cannot identify any books claimed to be published. There are no references for the affiliations listed, or for individuals being memebers. DGG ( talk ) 21:02, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 21:04, 13 May 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CommanderWaterford (talk) 21:27, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

• Keep. First off it doesn’t exist any more 1. However I found a number of sources that give it decent coverage, including 2, 3 and 4. It is mentioned in many other books but because Google books now mostly shows snippet views I can’t tell how much depth those mentions involve. Mccapra (talk) 03:02, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Missvain (talk) 23:00, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.