Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sober (Inna song)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Inna. (non-admin closure) -- Dane ^talk 04:21, 18 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sober (Inna song)[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A similar discussion is under way for the song "VKTM" which Inna is featured on over at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VKTM. The article should not have passed WP:GA status as it fails on criteria 2 (verifiable) and 2 (broad in coverage) (Wikipedia:Good_article_criteria#The_six_good_article_criteria). GA aside, when you exclude the YouTube and iTunes sources, it hasn't received extensive coverage and is really a WP:STUB. There are some guidelines on stubs at WP:NSONG which say articles unlikely ever to grow beyond stubs should be merged to articles about an artist or album. This falls into that category too. The song just isn't notable enough for its own article - coverage is limited and the skeleton of the article is made up of promotional or non-independent sources. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 19:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 19:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Romania-related deletion discussions. ≫ (Lil-Unique1) -{ Talk }- 19:41, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Inna due to a lack of significant coverage in third-party, reliable sources. It is a shame because I really enjoy this song. I propose a redirect as this is a viable search term and could help readers more than an outright deletion. Aoba47 (talk) 05:08, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per above. The coverage is minimal and this should have never even been considered for GA status. Can we get reviewers who understand the GA criteria? Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:32, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.