Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snopperman

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. howch e ng {chat} 20:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Snopperman

NN possible hoax. Snopperman produces two google hits and Vaft Rudner zero. JLaTondre 02:56, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. - Rudykog 02:58, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Nonsense content. -- (aeropagitica) 07:14, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete we really need to expand WP:CSD to allow speedy deletion of nonsense that while not "patent nonsense" is still a stupid case of complete bollocks Segv11 ^{(talk/contribs)} 09:16, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, but they need to be worded in such a way, badly written, but useful info isn't deleted because of it by mistake. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:35, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nonsense -- Astrokey44|talk 12:12, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-notable and if it's an Internet meme I sure as hell ain't heard of it. Cyde Weys _vote^talk 15:20, 12 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.