Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Snootworld

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. There seems to be little verifiable information currently, and the delete votes are more backed up by policy that the keep votes are. NW (Talk) 03:15, 15 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Snootworld

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails guidelines for future films. Lugnuts (talk) 06:55, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Once (a lot more of) information is found it will likely be notable, but at the moment nothing is known about it except for the fact that it (very likely) will be shot. McMarcoP (talk) 09:36, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Upcoming film by a notable and significant director. Zazaban (talk) 19:24, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Whilst unreleased films can be notable, there doesn't appear to be coverage of this in reliable sources. Even though it has a notable director, it still needs decent sources. Quantpole (talk) 19:59, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep or Merge (for now) to David Lynch. Notable project. ChildofMidnight (talk) 21:21, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:15, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to David Lynch as per ChildofMidnight. --Cyclopia (talk) 12:51, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Um. Can anybody find any reliable sources to even verify this film's existence? As I understand it, IMDB is not one. The usual google searches turned up nada. Ray^Talk 14:45, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, Merge to David Lynch or Userfy. I also feel it is a notable project. Ikip (talk) 00:57, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notable perhaps, but is it verifiable? Chillum 03:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A David Lynch film? This will be anticipated for years. Let all the fans collate their facts here. Varks Spira (talk) 02:36, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Letting fans collect their facts here is precisely what we do not want to do. We do not engage in original research here, we base our articles off of reliable sources. This is why we don't have articles on subjects that don't have significant coverage, they end up being original research. Chillum 03:19, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per policy. We are not a crystal ball. Imdb is not a reliable source. We don't know what if this is really what it will be called, we don't know if it is really David Lynch, we don't know anything. Anyone can insert any information into imdb if they know how. When a source on which we can base an article exist then and only then should we have an article on the subject. Chillum 03:16, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete whenever this gets to be official, have the article done. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.201.28.220 (talk) 03:40, 10 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.