Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smirting
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was KEEP. Mo0[talk] 04:20, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Orphan neologism that isn't in common use, nor is it ever going to be much more than a dicdef Night Gyr 10:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Night Gyr 10:21, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. It's already more than a dicdef, and the first page of google results includes some news stories about the term [1] [2] [3] ×Meegs 11:15, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep mentioned in news stories in several countries -- Astrokey44|talk 23:30, 19 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep per Meegs. Stifle 00:39, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- keep, real activity. Kappa 08:11, 22 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.