Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Smiley's People (essay)
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. North America1000 12:26, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Smiley's People (essay) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
In the words of the person who wrote this essay, it is a "silly little opinion piece". Fails GNG - sources 1 and 4 are not independent, source 3 is a trivial mention, I cannot see the text of source 2. (Contested PROD in 2018.) Cerebellum (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 14:33, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete: Definitely weasel words and not encylopaedic in nature. Reference 2 is simply index notes. It is a silly opinion piece and fails GNG. --Whiteguru (talk) 21:54, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and above opinion piece fails WP:GNG.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 09:22, 28 November 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.