Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SmartScore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep as nominator has withdrawn + there is no support for a deletion. (non-admin closure) CorporateM (Talk) 01:13, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SmartScore

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article is absent of any proper sources other than the company website. It's possible a properly sourced article could be written, but for now there is nothing in the current article to keep. CorporateM (Talk) 15:22, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious keep. The article clearly needs a lot of work, and has been tagged as such for a while. But the product is fully notable, and deletion does not seem to be in any way an appropriate response. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep the article now contains at least some sources and enough material worth keeping to keep the article, rather than scrap it. CorporateM (Talk) 21:42, 30 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 00:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

As there is an article on the parent company I can't see how deletion would be preferable to a merge if the subject is not independently notable. Candleabracadabra (talk) 05:11, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Coverage in some very reputable publications. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 07:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Question: given that the nominator has voted keep above, should this now be closed as a speedy keep? Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 16:51, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.