Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Small country syndrome

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 21:02, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Small country syndrome

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One-sentence stub with a dicdef and a list of sources that allegedly make use of the term. May belong in Wiktionary instead.

Failed prod in Aug 2015, tagged for expansion since Mar 2016, hasn't attracted any.

Both contributors, Aelffin and Sofia Koutsouveli, had left the project. --81.96.84.137 (talk) 23:09, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I moved the above from the article's talkpage. No comment on the nomination. ansh 666 01:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There are several references using the words "small country syndrome" but each of them applies a different meaning. It's a catchy phrase that writers interpret to suit their story.There is no specific, definitive meaning to it.Glendoremus (talk) 04:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep potentially expandable stub; offline sources DarjeelingTea (talk) 10:08, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Google Books has four times as many hits for "small penis syndrome"; does this encourage you to create an article on small penis syndrome? (Please don't!) --131.111.5.45 (talk) 10:21, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I hate to break it to you but we actually do have an article on Small Penis Syndrome. DarjeelingTea (talk) 18:59, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 13:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Single-sentence article, with no historical context or verifiable examples. Dimadick (talk) 18:48, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.