Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SlingApp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 18:27, 22 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

SlingApp[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The organization is not notable as per WP:ORG. It fails in many of the aspects like that adhering to WP:CORPDEPTH. The article also lacks WP:RS and contains secondary sources. The second response from 'contested deletion' as per Talk:SlingApp makes it WP:PROMOTIONAL ~Amkgp ✉ 10:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ~Amkgp ✉ 10:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Malaysia-related deletion discussions. ~Amkgp ✉ 10:19, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 08:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Some of the text is promotional in tone, though that could be fixed by editing. However, the article is describing the app's features and proposition, supported by start-up coverage, and listing several industry start-up awards; I am not seeing evidence that notability has been attained. AllyD (talk) 08:43, 21 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.