Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleepy Hollow (Mars)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect , as indicated in the nom. Doing so after this close given the differing targets Star Mississippi 02:52, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Sleepy Hollow (Mars)

Also including: Larry's Lookout

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Neither of these are notable Martian geographic features. According to the one research paper that discusses it [1] Sleepy Hollow likely represents a degraded impact crater with an approximate diameter of 17 metres. For comparison, there are 90 million craters on mars over 25 metres in diameter [2]. The paper doesn't really substantiate that the hollow is itself notable, the information is better included in a hypothetical article on Martian impact cratering. Sleepy Hollow is mentioned in the Spirit (rover) article and can be redirected there. Larry's Lookout is discussed in research papers as part of the broader topic of Husband Hill of which it is part, and should probably be redirected there, as it lacks any separate notability. Husband Hill could maybe be merged into Columbia Hills (Mars), but that's outside the scope of this AfD. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Hemiauchenia (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect per nom. PianoDan (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bungle ^{(talk • contribs)} 22:19, 3 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect As per nom. Deathlibrarian (talk) 01:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.