Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleek

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MER-C 06:28, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sleek

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Completely unsourced article about a magazine, with no strong claim to passing WP:NMAG. As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which every print publication is automatically entitled to an article just because it exists; the magazine must be the subject of reliable source coverage, in media other than its own self-published content about itself, for an article to become earned. For added bonus, somebody associated with the magazine has been actively trying to replace the whole article with an even more deliberately advertorialized PR version, in defiance of WP:COI. Bearcat (talk) 17:51, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I don't see any reliable sources or notability here, additionally the Lead Award is unable to be sourced. Chrissymad ❯❯❯ Talk 18:28, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of News media-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete move Sleek (disambiguation) over the title space. In ictu oculi (talk) 19:13, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.