Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slappy and the Stinkers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn with no remaining deletion proposals (non-admin closure) Atlantic306 (talk) 23:27, 19 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Slappy and the Stinkers

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film. Does not appear to meet WP:GNG or WP:NFILM. I cannot find any independent significant coverage of this movie. (Article was deleted in 2008 by WP:PROD.) Schazjmd (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn by nominator, and my thanks to the editor(s) who added the refs to the article. My before obviously fell short in this case. Schazjmd (talk) 14:32, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Schazjmd (talk) 18:03, 14 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. Was reviewed in the New York Times, in Variety, in TV guide, by Roger Ebert, etc! Sources about production and release abound. So Strong Keep.. ~~Will~~ add(ed) those sources to the page but a withdrawal of this nomination would be appreciated and save other contributors' time, I should think. Thank you.-My, oh my! (Mushy Yank) 00:53, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per NFO #1, two nationally known critics, Ebert and Van Gelder. Agree with @Mushy Yank this AfD is a time-waster. Oblivy (talk) 02:08, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per WP:HEY. As it turned out, the nomination was both sloppy and a stinker. (I gamble that you have some self-deprecating humor on this.) Geschichte (talk) 09:13, 15 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.