Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Slack City

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. plicit 14:45, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Slack City (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Someone tried to draftify this, but they were accused of page-move vandalism when they did so and were informed that sources could be found on Google. I tried Googling, and got a bunch of non-independent/unreliable (blog posts, press releases, etc.); of course, those sorts of sources don't actually prove notability. I dream of horses (Hoofprints) (Neigh at me) 14:18, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nomination. I looked hopefully for some RS, based on the edit summary that you mentioned, but only found passing mentions in a very few reliable sources. Wikishovel (talk) 15:24, 24 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom and Wikishovel. I also tried to find sources in places that are known to have good, reliable coverage of UK radio and drew a blank. I found three items:
1. A Guardian radio review article from August 2023, passing mention of one programme produced by the station
2. An interview with a presenter in the Radio Times in January 2023, not about the station, not RS as it is an interview
3. A five-line local newspaper article from the Greenock Telegraph in June 2021 about a local artist who had a song played on Slack City
I also had a look for sources for "totallyradio", which is apparently the station's previous name. Despite this station apparently being 'the UK's longest running internet radio station' there was also nothing of note. I don't feel like these constitute WP:RS, even taken together. Flip Format (talk) 11:01, 25 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.