Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skypecasting

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mindmatrix 02:56, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Skypecasting[edit]

Yes because combining two useless words together makes it even more useless. non-notable concept, etc Timecop 08:30, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strong keep - 187,000 hits on google, many articles explaining what it is, eg [1] --Oscarthecat 08:36, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep , possible Merge with other podcasting articles (see possible merge of podnography et al). —Quarl (talk) 2006-01-05 09:06Z
  • Delete - possible delete or just delete - Femmina 09:08, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep many google hits including slashdot and new scientist -- Astrokey44|talk 10:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Not very notable --Depakote 11:52, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • I don't care if it has google hits. It's a neologism. Delete, and if that won't work, redirect to Skype. Proto t c 13:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete (or more weakly, merge) per Proto. --Hosterweis 13:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Podcast if the information is required at all. -- (aeropagitica)  15:44, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete - Nom. --Kilo-Lima 17:39, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong Delete. Worthless foocasting neologism. Incognito 18:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. --kingboyk 18:18, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom TapirUser had 8 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes
  • Delete No. Jmax- 19:03, 5 January 2006 (UTC)User had 3 edits before this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes[reply]
  • Delete This should just be trashed. Eusebeus 20:02, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Strong keep. For reasons stated above. Oh and hello to all the new editors. -- JJay 21:19, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
    • How could you possibly vote to Strong Keep this????? Eusebeus 05:19, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
      • Check JJay's voting history: some people have less of a problem with trivia than others; JJay seems not to mind it as long as it's verifiable, which is his prerogative. I disagree, but that's mine. - Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 12:43, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
        • I also dislike block voting and sockpuppets. -- JJay 22:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
See nom's talk page for details. -- JJay 19:57, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete for preference, but perhaps merge all foocasting to one single Cruft-O-Rama. Just zis  Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 22:29, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Merge with Skype. Tom Foolery 01:45, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom. Forallah 02:34, 6 January 2006 (UTC)User's only edits are to this recent blizzard of podcasting/blog "delete" votes and his/her talk page[reply]
  • Delete per other delete votes. Cptchipjew 10:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Mergewith Skype which is hardly a useless word. Crunch 19:32, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete/Merge per above WhiteNight T | @ | C 08:22, 9 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - was looking for SkypeCasting on Google. Found this article. Now I understand what the term is about!
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Skypecasting&oldid=1080075154"