Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skylar Thomson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 02:05, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skylar Thomson

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsigned musician; contested prod. Google comes up with nothing but MySpace and Facebook profiles. Erpert (let's talk about it) 07:38, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that this should be deleted. This looks like as if it was made by the person herself in order to promote herself. Nobody has heard of her before and it goes against WP:BLPSPS among other things.

Johnclow13 11:29, 26 March 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Johnclow13 (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- -- Lear's Fool (talk | contribs) 10:39, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I nominated this for speedy deletion yesterday, having spent a while attempting to save it and looking pretty hard for references. When I stripped out all the promo and peacock terms to achieve a neutral tone, and removed the litter of name-dropping redlinks, there was nothing left that was verifiable or that credibly asserted notability. No refs except MySpace and Facebook. It was duly speedied, and has been recreated today in a shorter form but essentially still with no citations. I also nominated the image as a possibly unfree image. She exists and obviously has a career, but without any refs I can't see that it should stay this time either. Ka renjc 12:01, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I can't find any sources that demonstrate notability. Google turns up a lot of social networking sites and other promo-based sites not independent from the subject. PDCook (talk) 14:11, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. There's a lot of name-dropping here, but no claims to notability per WP:BAND. When you strip out the puffery there's very little of substance left. — Gwalla | Talk 17:26, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Strong delete Per WP:NMUSIC, also spammy ukexpat (talk) 21:31, 26 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Links are to social networking sites, which are both not reliable source's. Also doesn't assert notability. --Bsadowski1 22:55, 27 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.