Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skylar McKeith-Magaziner
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 20:15, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
Skylar McKeith-Magaziner[edit]
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Skylar McKeith-Magaziner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Non-notable lawyer that fails WP:GNG. Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Waddles 🗩 🖉 22:09, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nominator; there are no sources that would show subject's notability.--Melaleuca alternifolia | talk 22:41, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete – her legal career doesn't seem to have attracted significant coverage, and being mentioned in a few tabloids because of your notable mother certainly doesn't confer notability. See WP:INVALIDBIO. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 00:00, 29 August 2021 (UTC)
- Delete fails WP:GNG upcoming lawyer as of now a case of WP:TOOSOON.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 18:06, 3 September 2021 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.