Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skye englert

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted a7 (no credible assertion of notability) by User:JohnCD. NawlinWiki (talk) 15:34, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Skye englert[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Note to closing admin: The article has now been moved to Skye Englert. I mention this because I have in the past known an AfD to conclude "delete", and the closing admin to delete the page named in the nomination, which has become a redirect, with the result that the original article has been left undeleted. So, if the conclusion is "delete" please make sure this doesn't happen! JamesBWatson (talk) 12:27, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Since I wrote that both have been repeatedly speedy-deleted, so unless they have been recreated (again) it is irrelevant. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:02, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Time to salt? PDCook (talk) 14:53, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Procedural nom.

A BLP that has had PROD tags removed by the original creator and reinstated (rinse, repeat) a few times now. To save us all the fun, I'm putting it up on AfD now, per nom. Will inform the prod nomintator so they can make a statement. Shadowjams (talk) 09:45, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Delete although I am not the original nominator, I tend to agree that the article, in it's current state, fails WP:BIO. I think it may be salvageable, which weakens my stance on deletion. ^Avicenna_sis @ 09:52, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, no indication of notability per WP:BIO, no sources cited. NawlinWiki (talk) 12:11, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Very strong delete The article gives no independent sources to back up its claims, so I looked around. I found no support at all for the claims made in the article: for example, the article claimed that Englert would play a leading role in "the new Disney Channel show/pilot The crazy life of Annie Willis". I found that a Google search for "Skye Englert" "The crazy life of Annie Willis" produced this Wikipedia article and nothing else. It was similar with other searches: no support at all. What is even more striking is the fact that Englert's own postings on twitter and starnow do not make any such claims for her. In fact the biggest claims I found were "Ive done a little bit of acting in the past few years. I create my own videos for my youtube channel ... I use to do modeling for parodz for about half a year then finished". Perhaps the most interesting discovery was this tweetmeme page, which says "IM ON WIKIPEDIA!!!! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skye_englert". Clearly the whole thing is a fantasy/vanity page by a schoolgirl, and not in the least notable. JamesBWatson (talk) 12:22, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - A Google search turns up social networking site and the WP page, and I see no reliable sources that demonstrate notability. PDCook (talk) 18:41, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note The article has now been speedily deleted four times. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.