The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was SpeediedWikibofh 14:31, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Was requested as a speedy, doesn't quite meet the patent nonsense rule, but it's not far off RoySmith 01:31, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete --Rogerd 01:52, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Deserves a speedy tad due to its status as an ad for something that will occur before the 5 days expires, but alas, that is not a criteria. --CastAStone 02:01, 12 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
