Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sky Blu (rapper)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus to keep following relisting. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 12:09, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sky Blu (rapper)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Tagged since 2012 as needing more sources, I did some research and came up with nothing other than the usual YouTube stuff and social media. In my opinion this fails WP:MUSICBIO. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:22, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:24, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The most interesting thing I've seen is the alleged altercation with Mitt Romney. [1]. Jacona (talk) 16:06, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I opposed the creation of this article from the breakup with Redfoo / LMFAO, but the artist meets the minimum requirements, having charted as a solo act and having been part of a duo with a number one hit. μηδείς (talk) 18:15, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 07:42, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. #1 on the chart for "Party Rock Anthem" as part of LMFAO establishes notability. Jacona (talk) 16:35, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:34, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep at least for as it seems there's enough for something of a separate article for now. SwisterTwister talk 19:57, 17 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.