Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skip the Foreplay

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. —Tom Morris (talk) 10:22, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Skip the Foreplay[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Band who shows no notability. Lacks multiple releases on an important label. Touring lacks coverage. Does not inherit notability from bands they've shared the stage with. Sources are primary or are not reliable sources. Lacks coverage in independent reliable sources. Nothing satisfying WP:MUSIC. duffbeerforme (talk) 07:37, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Much of the coverage found was the news item about the band signing to Epitaph (e.g. [1], [2]) but there is more out there: [3], [4], [5]. --Michig (talk) 11:52, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 23:17, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep meets WP:BAND # 1. Articles in Exclaim!, The Georgia Straight, and Voir are from three different provinces, are independent of the subject, and are sufficient for a keep. There's a bio of the band at AMP Magazine. Like user Michig, I didn't do a complete search and there's more out there. I did add them to the external links section. Argolin (talk) 02:54, 17 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.