Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skink (record label)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Showtek. (non-admin closure) SST flyer 10:24, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Skink (record label)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable vanity label that fails WP:MUSIC entirely. Redirect to Spinnin' Records Karst (talk) 14:41, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Fails WP:ORG. Not notable. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:31, 23 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MBisanz ^talk 23:49, 30 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Per nom and above, label fails WP:ORG and WP:MUSIC and should be deleted. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 01:11, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Showtek, the label's founder. 86.84.247.233 (talk) 14:49, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Above comment made by blocked sockpuppet. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:59, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Showtek. Certainly notable artists have recorded for the label and there have been hits on the label, but that doesn't make the label itself notable, and there is absolutely no indication of its independent notability. Fails WP:INHERITORG and WP:ORGDEPTH. Richard3120 (talk) 16:06, 4 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.