Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skindiver (trademark)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 06:21, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Skindiver (trademark)[edit]

Skindiver (trademark) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Violated WP:PRODUCT - Trademark is dead in US according to US patent office http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4804:ek2t7e.2.2. Cannot find any reliable source that discusses product and indicates owner of it or where it is trademarked. Rogermx (talk) 17:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 20:14, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 22:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete as per nom. Refs are largely to a body-modification wiki, and aren't about the Trademark, which is the nominal subject of this bizarre article. power~enwiki (π, ν) 17:07, 20 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.