Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkillJam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to FUN Technologies. (non-admin closure) Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:11, 1 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

SkillJam

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly not notable enough, it fails WP:WEB and the article has no references and sources at all. ApprenticeFan ^{talk contribs} 12:38, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of video game related deletion discussions. MrKIA11 (talk) 13:21, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - the sources I found were all based on press releases, or just a brief mention in non-reliable sources. -- PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 13:30, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Juliancolton | ^Talk 00:20, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merge/redirect to FUN Technologies SkillJam is a subsidiary of FUN Technologies, so merging would be the best alternative to deletion. I have completed the merge. Cunard (talk) 06:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and redirect per Cunard. (I created the target article but only to resolve some redlinks - I have no COI.) - Fayenatic (talk) 18:28, 25 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.