Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/SkillBet.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete--Ymblanter (talk) 09:43, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SkillBet.com

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:ORG. The article has only one independent reliable source, but as per WP:ORG, "A single independent source is almost never sufficient for demonstrating the notability of an organization." RJaguar3 | u | t 16:09, 2 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 17:35, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man 01:51, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - I haven't looked at the sources, but FYI to anyone who cares: SkillBet is no longer accepting deposits and as far as I know the future of the site is pretty uncertain. --Rhododendrites (talk) 03:46, 10 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Regardless of whether or not it still exists, this is essentially promotion of a non-notable subject. DGG ( talk ) 05:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Per DGG. It's possible that a mention of this might be appropriate at Online poker, United States v. Scheinberg, or some other relevant article about the online poker business and its legal issues, but I don't see enough to warrant a separate article about this particular entity. --Arxiloxos (talk) 08:13, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.