Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ski-Whoop
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Nishkid64 (talk) 01:16, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article was proposed for deletion on the grounds that it was a neologism, per section 2 of WP:NEO. My additional concern about this term is that of the 7 Google hits on this spelling, none appear to easily conform to "Philadelphia usage". As such, I believe the term is either non-notable or unverifiable, or perhaps this a hoax article. Kife 23:06, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Don't you need to at least pretend to cite a reason for removing a prod notice, not "tweaking definition"? I believe that the prod could've been restored as it was removed out of process. But as that is neither here nore there any longer, I support deletion for the reason cited in the prod nomination. seresin wasn't he just...? 00:33, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Given the speed with which the notice was removed, and the fact that it wasn't accompanied by obvious vandalism, I chose to follow the spirit of Wikipedia:PROD#Conflicts and assume the removal was for a reason, albeit not yet stated. --Kife 08:38, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non-notable, unsourced violation of WP:NEO.Earthdirt (talk) 01:49, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. This WP:NEO does not meet notability requirements. - Headwes (talk) 04:46, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as nn neologism per WP:NEO Mayalld (talk) 08:43, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Non notable, unsourced, neologism --Nate1481( t/c) 10:52, 16 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.