Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Skeen Rocks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge‎ to Avian Island. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:43, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Skeen Rocks[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing on the page shows notability. Geographical features that appear on maps are not necessarily notable and WP:NOTEVERYTHING JMWt (talk) 07:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Antarctica. JMWt (talk) 07:29, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - No indication of notability, appears to be an extremely minor feature. –dlthewave ☎ 12:01, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A geographic feature that wasn't even named until 1963 is probably not significant, and with no sourcing, WP:NOTEVERYTHING indeed. WeirdNAnnoyed (talk) 13:52, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge Merged it into Avian Island, worth a mention.♦ Dr. Blofeld 14:19, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Avian Island. The information on coordinates and name origin can be held there, in line with WP:GEONATURAL. Aymatth2 (talk) 16:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Avian Island. This is easy for the closing admin: Dr. Blofeld has already added the info to the Avian Island article. --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 01:58, 26 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Avian Island per Wikipedia:Notability (geographic features), which says "If a Wikipedia article cannot be developed using known sources, information on the feature can instead be included in a more general article on local geography. For example, a river island with no information available except name and location should probably be described in an article on the river." Espresso Addict (talk) 20:56, 31 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.